Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Nonconceptualist Manifesto


The Nonconceptual originates in the narrow space between the (merely) conceptual and the (hollowly) anticonceptual, as a phantasm of the former's false consciousness and as an antidote to the latter's adventurist Weltschmerz. Its burden is not so much the impossibility of the conceptual, as the impossibility of the postconceptual, its would-be-proleptic elder sister.

The Nonconceptual artist must find an ideologeme absent of polemic, an interpellated, rhizomic core with no social exterior, from which to de-actualize the infinitely deferred moment of arrested poiesis that will fail to herald the uncloaking of a final asemantic absence. In its place, no chasm emerges but the space left by what does not become material as a result of either that initial deferral or the empty gestures at reversal that never follow it. This means that the Nonconceptual is always both outside the conceptual and next to itself--it "attends" itself as a proxy Other, since the specter of an actual Other cannot even be denied to it in any determinate mode of having-been-denied, but rather its denials arrive as peremptory pseudogestures, like little salutes from a poorly-drawn Belgian lieutenant in a child's book of subalterns.

We hold the central procedural tenets of Nonconceptualism to be:

1) total exploitation of the aleatory differend
2) rejection of any vulgar constructivist chauvinism whereby suture subtends torque
3) modal sensuousness over concretist heroics
4) occasional recourse to images of seagulls
5) at the baseline of practice, a constant shuffling of the predatory and the abject constitutive valences, so that "innovation" cannot be recuperated as "legitimacy"

15 comments:

Nicholas Manning said...

Kasey, masterly Zukunftsmusik. Just a question: is your employment of “having-been-denied” not as concept but as gyrationally transcendental coup-de-dès (a sort of Ancient Mariner piratic event-horizon?) geared not so much in terms of a quest for an informationally synergistic “horizontality” as a patheme of affective “horizonality”? (The anagrammatic rearranging of the French term « carence » may be helpful here; but also it may not). I trust the prolepsis is clearing up nicely . . .

Providence said...

This can be read, especially qua "concretist heroics," as a systematic indictment of any "conceptual" embrace of Jackson Mac Low.

Ryan said...

Manifestoism is the spunk of lore n' legend! Huzzah!

Henry Gould said...

Kasey, just a question : would you consider my favorite poet, Elwood Jaundice III, to be a true Non-Conceptualist?

I would offer a sample here, but I can't remember any of his poetry at the moment, and his book, which I just had in my hands a moment ago, was taken away by a small tornado, which came out of the northwest, at about 11:05 Eastern Time.

The book's title was "My Concept of Spring". (Does this help?)

Ryan said...

Everyone is on drugs.

sandrasimonds said...

I am not on drugz.

brian salchert said...

I am a drug.
It's all in
the food I eat,
or in the food
that eats me.

phaneronoemikon said...

Angela Genusa spawned the word

Narirazhae

today, which I interpreted as

"foolish substance"

Narr -old german something fool
and
Rasa old sanskrit hiundu yada
flavor

Kristeva thought she was pretty
smart when she declared that

metaphor was illness
but look at the word psyche

psicke

in the ontologicality
of the primary enigma
(locust raga #307)

the deformational gap
of the subjective
is dispersed across
the entire surface of
being as the 'nature'
of epi-phenomenality
or the material sense
of 'abstraction'..
ie being is an abstraction
of substance.

if we return to poetry
with open hands
it is always 'non-conceptual'
ie Narirazhae

foolish substance.

That's really about all one can say,
because we don't fully understand
substance, and we don't fully understand consciousness, but

we do know that the affective gap
is libel to literalize or actuate
one of a multitude of historical constructs in the codonic language-enmeshed mind-organ called
brain, or taking the tip from string thory, "brane" as in "mem(e)-brane"..

if poetry is the 'flavor'
of that species of unknowing,
or the reality of the incandescent
weirdness of 'being a molecular being' then

the midieval tantric alchemical
term Rasa is perfect for the non-conceptual 'subject' of the poem, which is the raga or

rechaordering

record
chaos
order

combined in a grotesque
wholeness of unfinishednesses

flavor

a blind chemical event
that has to be interpreted

making the mind a kind of tongue

if f
is the eye as hand
and language as an agreement
or an agreement to agree
to disagree

what is left
of the rechaordering

is the

lavor

which is labor, lava

a magma of simultaneity.

distributed praxis.

and the words then
can become like historical slag
in an alchemical rechaordering
which may be purely symbolical
as in the Jungian view
or could be the liminal or intermediary step to a kind of
new 'folk semiotics' whereby
the realpolitik of bodies in space
is vitalized according to the poietic and multiplicative poetential of words themselves.

As Deleuze once said

Good Theory doesn't describe, it multiplies..

Lanny

Stan Apps said...

Nonceptualism is the plagiarism of the not yet written, an advance plagiarism that can only be distinguished from originality by the fact that the content of nonceptual writing is generally implicit. By recapitulating that which is fully realized in implication, the moment of creation is forestalled by retrospective simulacra.

Henry Gould said...

Then, in other words, Stan, I guess you're saying that LIFE BEGINS AT NON-CONCEPTION????? Is this how I read you?????

Hmm !!! Or am I reading too much into this????

Hmm !!!

Stan Apps said...

Nonceptualism is so boisterously pro-choice precisely because choice doesn't matter Henry.

Ryan said...

The choice has been made for you.
Dad thought repeatedly calling me stupid meant that I would have less choices, and be freer.

brian salchert said...

A nonceptual is a
pro-feshunole rag picker,
by witch I meen,
u gotstah noz
witch rags r
da wunz tah pik.
-
Rawng?

Jeremy James Thompson said...

Kasey,


Is a Transcept a Noncept Post-Op?

sandrasimonds said...

Time for Part 2, Kasey.