Friday, May 09, 2008

Emergent Forms: Jennifer Knox


EMERGENT FORMS: A 21ST-CENTURY READING SERIES

presents JENNIFER KNOX




author of A GRINGO LIKE ME (Soft Skull Press/Bloof Books, 2005) and DRUNK BY NOON (Bloof Books, 2007).

MONDAY, MAY 12th

2:00PM
INFORMAL COLLOQUIUM
Decker Writing Studio
Central Hall Room 240
Southern Oregon University

7:00pm
READING
Meese Meeting Room #305
Hannon Library
Southern Oregon University

Both events are free and open to the public (donations warmly accepted).

sponsored by the Dept. of Language, Literature, & Philosophy

for information call 541-552-6636

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Lost in the Frame: May


This month so far at Lost in the Frame:
Shooter
Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay


Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Lost in the Frame: April


Reviewed during the month of April at Lost in the Frame:
The Water Horse: Legend of the Deep
The Great Debaters
The Hot Rock
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead
Forgetting Sarah Marshall
Viridiana
Street Kings
Joy Ride
Breakheart Pass
The Long Night


Monday, April 28, 2008

Mitch Highfill, Moth Light




Abraham Lincoln is proud to present Mitch Highfill's chapbook Moth Light.

"The bird's cry sounds like its name
because the world is on fire."

19 pages
$5.00








Wednesday, April 23, 2008

The Constant Critic: Jack Collom & Lyn Hejinian, Situations, Sings




My review of Situations, Sings, by Jack Collom and Lyn Hejinian, is up at The Constant Critic.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Flarf Is Life




FLARF IS LIFE
2008 Holistic Expo & Peace Conference

THURSDAY, APR 24, 8:00pm, DIXON PLACE, 258 BOWERY, $8
Film, neo-benshi, and theater by:

Brandon Downing: Two new short films
Rob Fitterman: Film: Bisquick / Bismarck
Nada Gordon: Neo-benshi: "Uzumaki"
Mitch Highfill: Play: "The Secret History of the '60s"
Rodney Koeneke: Neo-benshi: "Mary Poppins"
Michael Magee: Play: "William Logan: A Sedentary Life"
K. Silem Mohammad & Gary Sullivan: Play: "Chain: A Dialog"
Kim Rosenfield: Neo-benshi: "Meglio Stasera / The Libido Theory"


FRIDAY, APR 25, 7:00pm, 300 Bowery, buzz "Sherry/Thomas," FREE
Publication party for new chapbooks, books, and DVDs by:

Brandon Downing: Dark Brandon (DVD)
Mitch Highfill: Moth Light
Sharon Mesmer: Virgin Formica
K. Silem Mohammad: Breathalyzer
Mel Nichols: Bicycle Day
Rod Smith: Deed
Gary Sullivan: PPL in a Depot

SATURDAY, APR 26, 6:00pm, BOWERY POETRY CLUB, 308 BOWERY, $8
A Segue reading to benefit Bowery Arts and Sciences, featuring:

Shanna Compton
Katie Degentesh
Benjamin Friedlander
Drew Gardner
Nada Gordon
Mitch Highfill
Rodney Koeneke
Michael Magee
Sharon Mesmer
K. Silem Mohammad
Mel Nichols
Eiríkur Örn Norðdahl
James Sherry
Rod Smith
Christina Strong

With music by the Drew Gardner Orchestra and The Saw Lady. Hosted by
Brandon Downing and Gary Sullivan.

This benefit reading will help keep Segue readings at an affordable $6.

Monday, April 21, 2008

Two Headed Dog


Muxtape!

Robert, how did you get that playlist in your sidebar?

Monday, April 14, 2008

100 Best-Loved Poems: Sir Thomas Wyatt, "The Lover Showeth How He Is Forsaken of Such as He Sometime Enjoyed"

Sir Thomas Wyatt
THE LOVER SHOWETH HOW HE IS FORSAKEN OF SUCH AS HE SOMETIME ENJOYED

They flee from me that sometime did me seek,
    With naked foot stalking in my chamber.
I have seen them gentle, tame, and meek,
    That now are wild, and do not once remember
    That sometime they have put themselves in danger
To take bread at my hand; and now they range,
Busily seeking with a continual change.

Thank'd be fortune, it hath been otherwise
    Twenty times better; but once, in special,
In thin array, after a pleasant guise,
    When her loose gown from her shoulders did fall,
    And she me caught in her arms long and small,
Therewithal all sweetly did me kiss,
And softly said, "Dear heart, how like you this?"

It was no dream; I lay broad waking:
    But all is turn'd, thorough my gentleness,
Into a strange fashion of forsaking;
    And I have leave to go, of her goodness;
    And she also to use new-fangleness.
But since that I so unkindly am served:
I fain would know what she hath deserved.

[Note that the Dover editor has very unprofessionally concocted his own hybrid text from the manuscript version and the one printed in 1557 in Tottel's Miscellany, but what're you gonna do.]

As it turns out, I've blogged about this poem here before. I don't have too much to add about it this time, except that it occurs to me that it's the inverse of Mike Jones' "Back Then."



Saturday, April 12, 2008

100 Best-Loved Poems: "Sir Patrick Spens"

SIR PATRICK SPENS

I. The Sailing

The king sits in Dunfermline town
    Drinking the blude-red wine;
"O whare will I get a skeely skipper
    To sail this new ship o' mine?"

O up and spak an eldern knight,
    Sat at the king's right knee;
"Sir Patrick Spens is the best sailor
    That ever sail'd the sea."

Our king has written a braid letter,
    And seal'd it with his hand,
And sent it to Sir Patrick Spens,
    Was walking on the strand.

"To Noroway, to Noroway,
    To Noroway o'er the faem;
The king's daughter o' Noroway,
    'Tis thou must bring her hame."

The first word that Sir Patrick read
    So loud, loud laugh'd he;
The neist word that Sir Patrick read
    The tear blinded his e'e.

"O wha is this has done this deed
    And tauld the king o' me,
To send us out, at this time o' year,
    To sail upon the sea?

"Be it wind, be it weet, be it hail, be it sleet,
    Our ship must sail the faem;
The king's daughter o' Noroway,
    'Tis we must fetch her hame."

They hoysed their sails on Monenday morn
    Wi' a' the speed they may;
They hae landed in Noroway
    Upon a Wodensday.

II. The Return

"Mak ready, mak ready, my merry men a'!
    Our gude ship sails the morn."
"Now ever alack, my master dear,
    I fear a deadly storm.

"I saw the new moon late yestreen
    Wi' the auld moon in her arm;
And if we gang to sea, master,
    I fear we'll come to harm."

They hadna sail'd a league, a league,
    A league but barely three,
When the lift grew dark, and the wind blew loud,
    And gurly grew the sea.

The ankers brak, and the topmast lap,
    It was sic a deadly storm:
And the waves cam owre the broken ship
    Till a' her sides were torn.

"Go fetch a web o' the silken claith,
    Another o' the twine,
And wap them into our ship's side,
    And let nae the sea come in."

They fetch'd a web o' the silken claith,
    Another o' the twine,
And they wapp'd them round that gude ship's side,
    But still the sea came in.

O laith, laith were our gude Scots lords
    To wet their cork-heel'd shoon;
But lang or a' the play was play'd
    They wat their hats aboon.

And mony was the feather bed
    That flatter'd on the faem;
And mony was the gude lord's son
    That never mair cam hame.

O lang, lang may the ladies sit,
    Wi' their fans into their hand,
Before they see Sir Patrick Spens
    Come sailing to the strand!

And lang, lang may the maidens sit
    Wi' their gowd kames in their hair,
A-waiting for their ain dear loves!
    For them they'll see nae mair.

Half-owre, half-owre to Aberdour,
    'Tis fifty fathoms deep;
And there lies gude Sir Patrick Spens,
    Wi' the Scots lords at his feet!

Hell yes it's a "grand old ballad," as Coleridge wrote in "Dejection: An Ode," which sadly does not appear in the Dover Thrift Edition of 100 Best-Loved Poems. "Sir Patrick Spens" rocks hard from the first stanza and never stops kicking major ass. "The king sits in Dunfermline town / Drinking the blude-red wine." Blude-red wine! We all know that most wine is basically sort of blude-red (most red wine, anyway), but when you say it, it makes it extra special. And Dunfermline! Exactly the sort of name you would want for a place where a king sits drinking blude-red wine. That is one king-drinking-blude-red-wine-sounding name of a place. Try not to think about the fact that Dunfermline now has two McDonaldses and a Pizza Hut (really). And "To Noroway, to Noroway, / To Noroway o'er the faem"--don't you want to actually go to Norway just so you can say that as you go there?

Then there's the beautiful, much-cited passage about the new moon with the old moon in her arm, and the sardonic repetition of "silken claith" and "twine" and "ship's side" and the sea that comes in despite everything. The poem reaches the pinnacle of its dark, dry (so to speak) humor in this stanza:
O laith, laith were our gude Scots lords
    To wet their cork-heel'd shoon;
But lang or a' the play was play'd
    They wat their hats aboon.

"They wat their hats aboon"! That's just cold.

"Sir Patrick Spens" stands better on its own without music than "Lord Randal," in my opinion: it's got that built-in swing, that piratic growl (like the sea on which Sir Patrick sails, it's "gurly," which the Dover editor glosses as "grim, surly." It's, like, riot-gurly.

The "plot point" of the Norwegian king's daughter is conspicuously unresolved. I mean, it's pretty obvious that she drowns like everyone else on the ship, but no mention of her is made after the first section. It's the men that are explicitly missed at poem's end. The ladies and maidens sit waiting for Sir Patrick and their "ain dear loves," just as, one imagines, all the "gude lord's son[s]" are expected by their fathers. But not a word about Miss Norway. You would think a king's daughter would be a bigger deal, especially as she was the main reason for the voyage in the first place. I can't help but draw a parallel with "Lord Randal," in which the "true love" plays a large part though her murderous act is mentioned only in oblique ways. Is there a misogynist implication that having a woman on board is what brings on the bad luck? Sir Patrick's bitter laughter upon hearing that he has to set out at a bad time of year to "fetch her hame" would seem to support this.

I didn't really mean to go in that direction, however. What interests me most about the king's daughter is just the way in which she, like so much else in the poem, serves as a minimally suggestive detail, hinting at a more complex narrative that never materializes. This is the haunting appeal of all those old anonymous songs. They're like Yorick's skull, whose very bareness spurs the mind to thinking of the fleshly life that once was.

Friday, April 11, 2008

100 Best-Loved Poems: "Lord Randal"




I've assigned the Dover paperback 100 Best-Loved Poems, edited by Philip Smith, for my creative writing classes because it's only $1.50 and has a hundred poems in it, most of which I consider essential reading for any student of poetry. It has a hideously ugly cover, so I tore mine off.

I thought I'd go through it poem by poem in order, posting each poem with a short commentary, because, oh I don't know, I don't have enough pressing projects breathing down my neck.

The first poem is the anonymous early modern ballad, "Lord Randal."
LORD RANDAL

"O where hae ye been, Lord Randal, my son?
O where hae ye been, my handsome young man?"
"I hae been to the wild wood; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm weary wi' hunting, and fain wald lie down."

"Where gat ye your dinner, Lord Randal, my son?
Where gat ye your dinner, my handsome young man?"
"I dined wi' my true-love; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm weary wi' hunting, and fain wald lie down."

"What gat ye to your dinner, Lord Randal, my son?
What gat ye to your dinner, my handsome young man?"
"I gat eels boil'd in broo'; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm weary wi' hunting, and fain wald lie down."

"What became of your bloodhounds, Lord Randal, my son?
What became of your bloodhounds, my handsome young man?"
"O they swell'd and they died; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm weary wi' hunting, and fain wald lie down."

"O I fear ye are poison'd, Lord Randal, my son!
O I fear ye are poison'd, my handsome young man!"
"O yes! I am poison'd; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm sick at the heart, and I fain wald lie down."

I used to think that most of the old ballads included in poetry anthologies were interesting more as historical examples of the development of a form than as actual reading material. I still sort of think that sometimes, and "Lord Randal" might be a case in point: this is clearly a text that is meant to be sung and heard, not just read on the page. Also, Dover reproduces the short version, which doesn't serve up the same closure as the longer version in which the last thing the young man says, when asked what he wants to leave his true love, is "hell-fire."

Nevertheless, all it takes is to read it aloud once or twice, and phrases like "I gat eels boil'd in broo' [broth]" implant themselves in your literary memory as richly evocative sound bites. (Let's pass over the observation that the prospect of eating anything called "eels boil'd in broo'" ought to raise a red flag vis-à-vis poisoning.) Actually, most of the lyrical energy of the song is in the repeated parts: "Lord Randal, my son," "my handsome young man," "mother, make my bed soon," "For I'm weary wi' hunting, and fain wald lie down." Whether it's the repetition that makes them so resonant, or any phrase repeated often enough becomes resonant, you could attach these tags to anything and it would sound good:
"O grasshopper sno-cones, Lord Randal, my son,
Aluminum siding, my handsome young man."
"Free-market ammonia; mother, make my bed soon,
For I'm weary wi' hunting, and fain wald lie down."

Also, I can't help picturing Tony Randall as the young man. So the poem's got that going for it.



Saturday, April 05, 2008

Recently Acquired




Books

J. Reuben Appelman, Make Loneliness (Otis Books/Seismicity Editions, 2008)
John Ashbery, A Worldly Country (Ecco [HarperCollins], 2007)
David Bromige, Tight Corners & What's Around Them (Black Sparrow Press, 1974)
Jack Collom and Lyn Hejinian, Situations, Sings (Adventures in Poetry, 2008)
Robert Duncan, The Opening of the Field (Grove Press, 1960)
Larry Eigner, Country Harbor Quiet Act Around (This Press, 1978)
Kenward Elmslie, Motor Disturbance (The Frank O'Hara Foundation at Columbia University Press, 1971)
Dick Gallup, Where I Hang My Hat (Harper & Row, 1970)
Daphne Gottlieb, Kissing Dead Girls (Soft Skull Press, 2008)
Michael Gottlieb, The Likes of Us (Harry Tankoos, 2007)
David J. Harkness and Gerald McMurtry, Lincoln's Favorite Poets (University of Tennessee Press, 1959)
Carla Harryman, Open Box (Belladonna Books, 2007)
Ron Padgett and Tom Veitch, Antlers in the Treetops (Coach House Press, 1973)
Bob Perelman, Face Value (Roof Books, 2008)
Bob Perelman, The First World (The Figures, 1986)
Lisa Robertson, The Men (Book Thug, 2006)
Kit Robinson, 9:45 (The Post-Apollo Press, 2003)
Kit Robinson and Alan Bernheimer, Cloud Eight (Sound & Language, 1999)
Ed Sanders, Tales of Beatnik Glory (Citadel Press, 1975, 1990)
Janet Sarbanes, Army of One (Otis Books/Seismicity Editions, 2008)
Mark Wallace, Felonies of Illusion (Edge Books, 2008)
Diane Ward, Relation (Roof Books, 1989)
Various Authors, The Grand Piano Part 3 (Mode A, 2007)

Chapbooks

Alan Bernheimer, State Lounge (Tuumba Press, 1981)
David Buuck, Site Cite City (Barge, 2008)
Edwin Denby, Snoring in New York (Angel Hair/Adventures in Poetry, 1974)
Mitch Highfill, Rebis (Openmouth Press, 2007)
Erica Kaufman, Censory Impulse (OMG, no date)
Chelsea Martin, Dream Date (no publisher, no date)
David Melnick, Men in Aida Book One (Tuumba Press, 1983)
James Sherry, Part Songs (Roof Books, 1978)
John Wheelwright, Selected Poems (New Directions [The Poet of the Month], 1941)
Rachel Zolf, Shoot & Weep (Nomados, 2008)

Journals

Area Sneaks 1 (2008)
Mirage #4/Period(ical) 148 (2008)
Sorry for Snake 2 (2007)
Sorry for Snake 3 (2008)
This Is Stupid I Love You (no number, no date)
Work 2 (2008)

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Davis on Whalen in The Nation


Jordan Davis on Philip Whalen in The Nation.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Hejinian & Mohammad @ 21 Grand


The (New) Reading Series @ 21 Grand presents



LYN HEJINIAN & K. SILEM MOHAMMAD

Sunday, March 30th
6:30pm

21 GRAND
416 25th St.
Oakland CA
$3

Monday, March 24, 2008

Sugarhigh on Immanent Critique




Jane Dark's Sugarhigh:
The frictionless, immediate, and unremarked slippage from immanent critique to intentional fallacy is a useful index of the problematic of enlisting partial concepts from one philosophical practice to bolster a quite different aesthetic claim.

Agreed. And yet, this is a problem that haunts the entire field of criticism, or "critique," writ large, exactly because the definitions are at stake not only of intention, or aesthetic, but of critique, and whether critique necessarily touches on the aesthetic. Certainly this has been at the heart of many a dark and dreary battle over the aims of academic literary studies and theory in recent years. Or, put another way, who agrees on what is immanent? Isn't the very notion of an "intentional fallacy" an argument for the non-immanence of aesthetic intentionality? And isn't that in itself an argument that can be taken in different directions toward different ends, including both determinist and idealist ends?

What I'm trying to say is that I am skeptical about both the model of the poem as transcendent fetish object and the model of the poem as index of concrete material factors (and also that I am tired of looking at my cheerfully inane Garfield Minus Garfield post). But I don't have the mental rigor to take this position further. I have just enough brains to conceptualize a few things clearly enough to convince myself that there is no base capable of supporting those few things within the same ideational system, and that therefore everything is ultimately incoherent and disgusting. This is the conservative impulse in me, inherited from some Enlightenment orientation toward intellectual pessimism, toward the conviction that all philosophical effort, as yet one more luxurious symptom, inevitably collapses into farce and despair. I'm not proud of it. It's lazy and self-serving at the same time that it's profoundly depressing. And I think it has something to do with the same part of me that's bad at math.

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Garfield Minus Garfield




Am I just easily amused? Yes. But Garfield Minus Garfield is one of the cleverest concepts to hit the Web since, I don't know, some other stuff.

Every once in a while, though, it's not that funny, because the removal of Garfield does little to change the original joke, and the strip is just as banal as it was at the start. Like this one: